Salt Lake City

Utah Yanks Stephen King’s ‘Different Seasons’ From School Shelves

AI Assisted Icon
Published on July 09, 2026
Utah Yanks Stephen King’s ‘Different Seasons’ From School ShelvesSource: Tussauds, CC BY-SA 2.5, via Wikimedia Commons

Stephen King just got the boot from Utah middle schools.

This week, state education officials added King’s collection Different Seasons to Utah’s list of titles that must be pulled from student access, effectively removing the book from middle school shelves in multiple districts. The decision folds into a growing wave of statewide library removals under Utah’s sensitive-materials rules and has kicked off another round of arguments among parents, librarians, and teachers over how far schools should go in restricting what kids can read.

According to KUTV, the Utah State Board of Education added Different Seasons to its official removal spreadsheet after the Davis, Jordan, Tooele, and Washington school districts each concluded the book contained material that was inappropriate for students. The title had been available there for students in grades 7 through 9. KUTV reports the board updated the statewide spreadsheet this week to reflect the new removal.

The Utah State Board’s library media page links to a public "titles to be removed" spreadsheet and notes that the list was updated on July 6. The site also includes guidance and reporting tools for districts that are handling challenges. Under state law, Utah Code section 53G-10-103 defines "objective sensitive material" broadly as pornographic or indecent content, including certain descriptions of fondling or other erotic touching. Once content crosses that legal threshold, it can trigger automatic removal across the state.

What Is In Different Seasons

First published in 1982, Different Seasons is a four-novella collection that includes "Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption," "Apt Pupil," "The Body," and "The Breathing Method." Two of those stories later became the films The Shawshank Redemption and Stand by Me. According to the author’s official site and other bibliographic records, the book has long shown up in reading lists for older middle school and high school students. Its mix of adult themes and occasional graphic passages has also sparked periodic challenges over the years. StephenKing.com lays out the contents of the collection and its film adaptations.

How The Statewide Removal Process Works

Utah’s statute requires the state board to pool local decisions. If at least three school districts, or two districts plus five charter schools, independently decide a book is "objective sensitive," every local education agency in the state has to remove that title from student access. The board is then required to notify districts within 10 school days.

The law also gives the state board the option to put an automatically removed title on a public meeting agenda and vote to overturn the removal. In practice, however, legislators, parents, and advocacy organizations have recently watched the aggregation system itself drive a steady stream of statewide pulls. The Utah State Board of Education’s library media page provides ongoing reporting and a public list of books that have been removed under the statute.

Reaction And Next Steps

Districts that log challenges are expected to keep copies out of student reach in school settings while local reviews play out. The state supplies forms, frequently asked questions, and other tools to help local education agencies navigate reporting and appeal procedures.

Critics, including some librarians and civil-liberties advocates, argue that the law lets a relatively small number of active districts drive decisions for the entire state and can result in historically significant works vanishing from shelves. Supporters counter that the rules are designed to keep minors away from content they view as explicitly pornographic. The state’s reporting tools detail the official paperwork and steps districts must follow.

Legal Context

The same statute spells out procedural safeguards and liability protections. It establishes review stages, requires public meetings for appeals, and directs the state to defend and indemnify people who are acting under color of state law to enforce the statute in most situations. Those provisions, along with the detailed objective and subjective standards that the law references, are laid out in the statutory text itself. For the exact wording and thresholds, readers can consult the Utah Code and related legal summaries.