Salt Lake City

Utah Judge Rules to Exclude Amendment A Votes, Ballots Unchanged Amid Fiscal Debate

AI Assisted Icon
Published on October 10, 2024
Utah Judge Rules to Exclude Amendment A Votes, Ballots Unchanged Amid Fiscal DebateSource: Google Street View

In a recent development from Utah's courts, voters will find themselves in a peculiar situation, Amendment A, proposed to the state's constitution, while present on their ballots, will not have its votes tallied or considered. This anomaly follows a decision from Judge Laura Scott in Utah's Third District Court, mirroring an earlier verdict regarding Amendment D. Despite the presence of the amendment on the ballots, the judge's ruling, referencing the Utah Supreme Court's logic applied to Amendment D, has rendered any votes for or against Amendment A moot. As reported by ABC4, the amendment will still visually appear before voters due to the printing of ballots preceding the court's decision.

The now-invalidated Amendment A concerned the fiscal future of Utah's budget, specifically, the earmark on the income tax intended for public education. Republican leaders in the state legislature had backed the idea, viewing it as a solution to budgetary instability. They contended that contrary to the more unpredictable sales tax, the income tax provided a reliable stream for funding essential government services. To sweeten the deal, legislators promised to cut the state portion of the sales tax on food if the amendment passed. Yet, this measure faced opposition from "Utahns for Student Success," a coalition spearheaded by the Utah Education Association. Even with advertisements and signs already circulating, their campaign against Amendment A hit a wall with the court's ruling, as noted by FOX13.

Moreover, it's worth noting that had Amendment A seen the light of day and been passed by voters, it would have ended years of advocacy aimed at removing the sales tax on food, a change previously contingent on the passage of HB54 and the approval of the constitutional amendment permitting income tax use beyond education, children's programs, and disability services. Still, the courts have taken a firm stance. In a recent ruling, they decreed that the results for Amendment A "shall not publish or release the tabulation results of votes cast for or against Amendment A to anyone," thus halting the tabulation and publication of its voting results, as reported by KSL Newsradio.